| Welcome to Blut Und Eisen. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Treaty Of London | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 14 2011, 09:18 AM (458 Views) | |
| Dragonknight2 | Jun 14 2011, 09:18 AM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Following a re-alignment of the British Empire's foreign and domestic policy objectives, we are now open to a negotiated peace. These are our terms for peace with the entire Russo-American alliance. All Indian core territory annexed by the Russo-American alliance is to be returned to the UK. The USA is to sign a 40 year NAP (longer if willing) with the UK The Russo-Alliance is to sign a 25 year NAP with the UK We are open to alterations (India is not negotiable). |
![]() |
|
| Ryeassassin | Jun 14 2011, 11:12 AM Post #2 |
![]()
|
If we accept this it does mean that the UK will no peruse its goal of Annexing New England? Also for any peace treaty to be sign with Austria. the UK has to recognize Austrian control over Egypt and Ethiopia and guarantee that it would interfere in the before mentioned territories. If those terms are met then Austria sees no reason to continue this war as long as our allies are willing to end the war.
|
![]() |
|
| Beg_Birdal | Jun 14 2011, 11:25 AM Post #3 |
![]() ![]()
|
Having limited navies as compared to UK is not good in my oppinion, especially because now with colonizing and all, navies are the true power. By accepting these offers i think that Russia is accepting the unchalanged UK dominance in the whole world. Thus, I would agree with all of the demands, but not the Naval limitation demand. Why should UK be the only unchallenged dominating power in the world?? Also, these demands make it look like UK won the war, which if far from the true. UK holds 3-5 million Americans hostage, while Russia holds 90+ million Indians.. Accepting these demands also means that UK can go on its crazy conquering spree even stronger than until now. Why should Russia accept to be the defeated nation in this war that they are winning??? Redicules in my opinion. UK you need to comeup with a much much much much much better offer than this in my opinion. |
![]() |
|
| theebum | Jun 14 2011, 04:19 PM Post #4 |
![]() ![]()
|
The President and Congress have no problems with the current plan other than the limit on naval power, we could agree to limit our navy to a number still strong enough to protect our coasts from other European countries. Even so this type of thing would be hard to regulate and would let the part of the world under the UKs thumb build with unrestricted numbers. A fleet limited to 200 or 250 ironclads would be enough to ensure both our coasts have a foundation to build upon if any other major European countries become aggressive. |
![]() |
|
| Ryeassassin | Jun 14 2011, 04:22 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
Thats true. no naval limitations treaties should be made unless it includes all the major powers |
![]() |
|
| The Professor | Jun 14 2011, 05:29 PM Post #6 |
![]()
|
Russia considers this a terrible treaty and all who sign it to also be terrible. |
![]() |
|
| Beg_Birdal | Jun 14 2011, 05:43 PM Post #7 |
![]() ![]()
|
As in war, so in peace discussions; Germany will stay faithfully to its Russian allay.
|
![]() |
|
| Dragonknight2 | Jun 14 2011, 09:37 PM Post #8 |
![]()
|
The UK will set aside its naval agreement then. (Not that it really made a difference, given Russia and Austria dont have any naval tech). Naturally a peace involving the entire alliance would involve no annexations of American territory (or any other territory for that matter, aside from the stolen Indian territory Russia took). However, It would be impossible to peace out with the USA, and thus lose our only bargaining chip, if Russia and its puppet Germany will continue an aggressive war forever. Although I suppose if the USA, Austria and France (who have shown themselves willing to negotiate) were to stand with Britain on this matter of enforcing a fair, white peace on Russia we would support it. Edit: We encourage all powers, even Russia's ally's, given their completer rejection of an effective status quo ante bellum peace and a refusal to even negotiate, to call upon Russia to halt its annexationist ambitions in India and end the war.
Taking over India unopposed is hardly 'winning'. |
![]() |
|
| The Professor | Jun 15 2011, 07:01 AM Post #9 |
![]()
|
I believe thats the very definition of winning. |
![]() |
|
| Ryeassassin | Jun 15 2011, 09:07 AM Post #10 |
![]()
|
The Austrian government would encourage all sides to take a minute and think over a negotiated peace. At present this war seems unlikely to end. the British control the sea and the Austo-Russo-German alliance has superior land forces. Neither side has much chance of forcing the other to surrender and if we want this war over we need to find a diplomatic way of settling this
|
![]() |
|
| Beg_Birdal | Jun 15 2011, 11:02 AM Post #11 |
![]() ![]()
|
That is true. But the British Prime Minister is extremely stubborn to respond to our demands. The world cannot be allowed to be all in red. This is not in interest for any country.
|
![]() |
|
| The Professor | Jun 15 2011, 10:27 PM Post #12 |
![]()
|
Russia offers the following counter proposal: UK WP USA British Alaska to Russian Crown. Russian Indian Colonies transfered to British Crown Afghanistan to be Russian "Protectorate". 25 Year NAP between all parties involved. Signed the Foreign Minister of the Russian Empire. |
![]() |
|
| Dragonknight2 | Jun 15 2011, 10:30 PM Post #13 |
![]()
|
Signed
|
![]() |
|
| Beg_Birdal | Jun 15 2011, 10:38 PM Post #14 |
![]() ![]()
|
Signed |
![]() |
|
| theebum | Jun 15 2011, 11:20 PM Post #15 |
![]() ![]()
|
Signed Hopefully this war will be a lesson for all nations and will discourage future wars of the same scale. |
![]() |
|
| Ryeassassin | Jun 16 2011, 08:39 AM Post #16 |
![]()
|
The Austrian government Signs this treaty but still wants the UK government to acknowledge Austrian control of Egypt and Ethiopia.
|
![]() |
|
| Leighroy | Jun 17 2011, 12:20 AM Post #17 |
![]()
|
Signed
|
![]() |
|
| LotosSlayer | Jun 17 2011, 09:30 AM Post #18 |
![]()
|
Signed.
|
![]() |
|
| Magister Equitum | Jun 19 2011, 01:11 PM Post #19 |
![]()
|
What does WP stand for?
|
![]() |
|
| ssj18vegeta | Jun 19 2011, 02:17 PM Post #20 |
![]() ![]()
|
White peace |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · The Gathering Storm 2 (Victoria II) · Next Topic » |












What does WP stand for?

5:57 PM Jul 10