Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Blut Und Eisen. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Embassy of the People's Republic of America; Washington D.C., PRA
Topic Started: Oct 24 2013, 02:56 PM (2,073 Views)
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
The Official Embassy of the
People's Republic of America


Posted Image

Posted Image... Posted Image

Capital: Washington D.C., PRA
Government Type: Dictatorship of the Proletariat
Chairman: Booker T. Washington


Foreign Policy:
*Peaceful relations with all nations while maintaining a strong national defense.

Domestic Policy:
*Create a classless society by eliminating the power of the bourgeoisie.
*Promote public education and literacy throughout American lands.
*Promote military and industrial development to secure American independence and prosperity.
*Ensure freedom for all former slaves in the U.S.
*Reconstruction of the American South.
*Encourage immigration


Spheres:
Haiti
Note: Any attempt to annex or take this country from American influence will be viewed as an act of aggression and may result in a declaration of war, with exception for Brazil and Chile.

Treaties:
*Oregon Treaty
*Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
*Treaty of Balboa

Alliances:
Mexico
DPRUN

Defensive Pacts:
None

NAPs
None

Edited for 1893?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Toledo

House of Commons
Republic of Mexico to the USA ambassador:

Estados Unidos Mexicanos thanks his neighbour nation, United States of America, for the recognition of its independence as an equal and sovereign nation.

However, we feel sad to hear that United States of America supports the texan revolt. This situation can only be solved in the battlefield.

¡Viva México independiente y soberano, carajo!

Signed: General Santa Ana, Presidente de la República Centralista de México.


:BIMEX: Independencia y Libertad :BIMEX:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Erthel
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIRUS2:

Russia greets the USA government and desires them a prosperous development.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Magister Equitum

Field Marshals
[align=center]Posted Image[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Otto of England
The Free State of Kiev
Viceroys
:BIJAP: Japanese Missive to The USA :BIJAPN:

Greeting to the USA, we are greatly interested in opening diplomatic relations between you and our selves. See Japan has shares sympathies with the USA in many regards, we have made a similar declaration to your monroe doctrine and we also dont like the idea of being involved with European wars, yet we just ask clarification on a few other topics.

One of these is Democracy, in Japan this term means nothing and we dont understand its need or use. Maybe America isnt as lucky to be blessed with a living God as Japan is but, do your gods hate you so much to not appoint a viceroy on earth such as the European countries? While I understand Japan is unique in the world that our Emperor is a living God so divine guidance is assured but, why do you not have somebody with Gods approval to rule your nation?

The other concept is that all men are created equal and there is no need for Kings and such. This seems just out right offensive as you are insulting our Emperor with this. Im certain this must be a translation error because you cannot be insinuating that our Emperor is the same as a mere mortal such as you and I, can you?

- Japanese Ambassador to America
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIUSA: :BIPRU: To the Prussian Monarchy:

We understand our form of governance is considered foreign or even naive by some powers across the Atlantic. To better understand our system of government, please examine a quote from a former colleague of mine. I quote now from John Adams, former President of the United States, under the penname Novanglus, in the seventh of a series of essays he wrote while under British rule before the establishment of our nation:

"...we are to be conjured out of our senses by the magic in the words “British empire,” and “supreme power of the state.” But, however it may sound, I say we are not a part of the British empire; because the British government is not an empire. The governments of France, Spain, &c. are not empires, but monarchies, supposed to be governed by fixed fundamental laws, though not really. The British government is still less entitled to the style of an empire. It is a limited monarchy. If Aristotle, Livy, and Harrington knew what a republic was, the British constitution is much more like a republic than an empire. They define a republic to be a government of laws, and not of men. If this definition be just, the British constitution is nothing more nor less than a republic, in which the king is first magistrate. This office being hereditary, and being possessed of such ample and splendid prerogatives, is no objection to the government’s being a republic, as long as it is bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend. An empire is a despotism, and an emperor a despot, bound by no law or limitation but his own will; it is a stretch of tyranny beyond absolute monarchy."

You see, no man, not even the head of state, is above the law of the land. In our country, law governs the government itself. We are a nation of laws, not of men. This is fully compatible with Christian notions of natural law. One may argue that no natural law exists - that certain laws under nations of men are unjust and proves law is created by man, even divine men. On the contrary, that some nations on Earth may have had bad laws, not rooted in reason, is not evidence that different standards of justice exist. Rather, it means that some laws are just while others are not. Thus, if an unjust law, that places an unjust burden on the people, comes to pass, the people are not bound to obey it.

This is the understanding of law by our people of these united states. Our public, at large, decides how they are to be ruled in our tripartite government. Our people decide for themselves what is just, and have decided as evidenced by our written constitution, above which no man sits.

I hope this gives the Prussian Kingdom some insight as to how our democracy functions. I respectfully advise your kingdom to heed the will of the people, for they truly decide the course of nations.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIUSA: :BIJAP: To the Japanese Envoy:

Thank you for your inquiry. We are very interested in explaining our concepts of governance to those interested. Unfortunately, our merchants have been turned away on numerous occasions at Japanese ports. It appears your country is gripped with an internal power struggle between your emperor and the shogunate. On the one hand, your emperor carries out diplomatic missions with world powers. On the other hand, another ruling faction in Japan, the shogunate, has shown great hostility toward our merchants.

Therefore, we are unwilling to carry on diplomatically until your emperor has control over his country (i.e. after the Meiji Restoration or Japan civilizes) or unless Japan submits under our sphere of influence and is willing to trade freely.

With respect, we urge you to consider opening up some trade ports with our nation so that we may continue diplomatic relations.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Magister Equitum

Field Marshals
Quote:
 
:BIUSA:
Dear friend and King of France:

... We support your efforts to promote liberalism throughout the globe...

Best regards to our friend across the Atlantic.


[align=center]Posted Image
Posted Image[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
am300307
Member Avatar

House of Commons
The UK agrees to sign the agreement regarding the 49th parrallel. Also the UK agrees with the Monroe Doctrine. Free trade with South American countries is important for their growth. If the USA desired extra British protection of South America, than we would require some spheres of those countries.

:BIENG:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Magister Equitum

Field Marshals
[align=center]Posted Image[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SchFerreira
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BISIC:

To His Excellency Mr. Andrew Jackson, President of the United States of America

The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies greets you. While our two countries are far apart and do not currently maintain diplomatic relations, HM The King has followed closely the situation in the Coahuila y Tejas state of the Mexican Republic. Thus, HM is very concerned at what seems to be an impending aggression by the USA against mexican territorial integrity, by supporting the rebel uprising in the region, one which it seems stems from an artificial influx of immigrants that have now taken control of the local politics. We believe it is imperative for peace and an international balance of power that the USA does not intervene in the conflict, a wise decision that will no doubt His Excellency make. Once your country officially announces it will not be supporting texan insurgency, The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies will be glad to receive an american ambassador, a courtesy that we expect Washington will reciprocate.


Signed: The Foreign Minister of The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Magister Equitum

Field Marshals
[align=center]Posted Image[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIUSA: From the Office of the President of the United States of America

In what can only be viewed as wanton and imminent Russian aggression, the U.S. government deems it necessary to establish a naval base in the island nation of Hawaii. As such, the U.S. intends to sphere this island nation.

It may become necessary, if European powers wish to interfere with internal politics in the Americas, for the U.S. to establish alliances with certain European powers, of which we traditionally have had a strong interest against.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Erthel
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIRUS2:

If the USA wants Russia to stay out of the americas, it should refrain from any influence to north east Asia.

We are willing to get to an agreement on this.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SchFerreira
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIITA:

Greetings to the United States of America.

The Kingdom of Italy has become aware that the USA has grown concerned over the recent military alliance between Italy and Spain. It appears that the United States government is preoccupied for the fate of its Monroe Doctrine, which essentially declared the US the policeman of the americas, even giving itself the duty to defend the "independence" even of lands that unlawfully rose in arms against their legitimate spanish rulers. That, however, is besides the point.

Although the Kingdom of Italy supports the Russian-Mexican side on the War of Yankee aggression (only because our country desires a reasonable the balance of power in the americas, which an american victory, with her unreasonable demands, would make impossible), we wish to make clear that we are completely opposed to any vulneration of american national sovereignty. In other words, we are opposed to the mexicans doing to the americans what the americans are attempting to do on Mexico. Thus, should the US come to its senses and accept a status quo offer of peace, The Kingdom of Italy would strive to persuade the people of Russia, Mexico and Spain to not not take away from one single american the right to live in the USA. A war started over such an insignificant handful of barely inhabited islands such as Hawaii should remain within those reasonable boundaries, and not be to destroy a country or to assert hegemony over the whole continent. Sadly, that seems to be the arrogant course that the US decided to take.

HM The King of Italy wishes to humbly ask the President of the United States to come to his senses and abandon this unnecessary war, one which has taken enough american lives already.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SchFerreira
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIITA:

Greetings to the United States of America

The Kingdom of Italy holds no territorial ambitions in the american continent, and most certainly does not want to go to war against the US. We do not want american territorial integrity vulnerated, yet only wish to secure a significant mexican presence in the politics of the New World. The reason for italian interest in this conflict have been made clear, yet we will state them again for the sake of peace: it is not in the best interest of the global balance of power for the US to be the dominant nation in the entire american continent (which is the implicit purpose of the Monroe Doctrine), with only Brazil to provide some type of rivalry in south america. We believe that a US victory under the american terms of peace would forever relegate Mexico to a secondary status in the continent, by taking away mexican constituent states north of the Rio Grande that, though sparsely populated, represent the richest of mexican territories in terms on natural resources. If we include, further, the obvious american intentions to annex Hawaii, thus gaining naval bases in close proximity to eastern asia, we believe this would only allow the US to become an imperial behemoth. It seems wise, then, to restore the balance of power in the american continent.

The Kingdom of Italy is currently at peace with the USA, a status we wish to maintain. We eagerly expect american intentions to negotiate the conflict to an end. We believe that if the war, unwinnable for the US in the long term with further russian and spanish involvement appearing imminent, drags on for long, the promise of maintaining US territorial integrity could fall apart, with Mexico attempting to reclaim Texas and perhaps the US losing even more.

We reiterate our promise that Italy has no intentions to win a foothold in the New World, and pray for the americans to come to reason.

This will be the last italian diplomatic pronouncement on the matter, until multilateral talks are engaged upon.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Toledo

House of Commons
:BIMEX:

The sovereign nation of Mexico, and me, General Santa Anna in its head, have decided, in this hard moment for our country, to accept and sign the Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty.

I hope this becomes a wise decision for our nation. Industrialization and modernization are necessary, and keeping good relations with our democratic neighbours seems a way direct to it. Let flow between our borders the investments and knowledge which will make of America the edge of the world.

Our both Republics of USA and Mexico seem to share a manifest destiny!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Erthel
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIRUS2:

Treaty for trans-Pacific peace

Russia and USA agree on the following Non Aggression Pact:

1) The signatory parties agree not to enter a state of war with each other.
2) The signatory parties agree not to interfere with each other sphere of influence.
3) In a war between sphere countries or allies, both nations agree to find a solution to the conflict depending on the situation, that will never include a direct military conflict between them.
4) Breaching such agreement would cost 50 prestige to the infractor.

:BIRUS2: signed (x)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
Erthel,Nov 8 2013
12:59 AM
:BIRUS2:

Treaty for trans-Pacific peace

Russia and USA agree on the following Non Aggression Pact:

1) The signatory parties agree not to enter a state of war with each other.
2) The signatory parties agree not to interfere with each other sphere of influence.
3) In a war between sphere countries or allies, both nations agree to find a solution to the conflict depending on the situation, that will never include a direct military conflict between them.
4) Breaching such agreement would cost 50 prestige to the infractor.

:BIRUS2: signed (x)

[x] :BIUSA: Signed
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly_boy
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BICHL: :BIUSA:

Presidente de la República, José Joaquín Pérez, extends the friendliest of greetings towards his American counterpart, President Abraham Lincoln. Our two Republics have long fought to keep European powers out of America - both North and South - and this has established a solid base on which our relations can flourish.

Having already signed a defensive agreement, señor Pérez requests the presence of American military and civilian officials in order to draft a comprehensive military agreement between our two Republics. Chile feels that a strong Chilean state will not only advance the goals of the people of Chile, but also those of the United States in South America.

We await your administration's response.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
[align=center]Posted Image

Posted Image
[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly_boy
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BICHL: :BIUSA:

We thank the American government for its swift response. President Lincoln's administration has already aided the Chilean government in a variety of ways, and we are thankful that you are sympathetic to the Chilean cause still. It is unfortunate that the United States do not wish to enter into an offensive alliance with Chile, but we will not let it sour our friendship.

We also received your communique about the renewal of our Defensive Pact. Seeing as the founding principle behind our two Republics' frienship is the love for the freedom of America, be it North or South, and seeing as the American administration has on countless occasions stated that it adhers to the Monroe Doctrine, the Chilean Government would like to amend the wording of the treaty to better reflect what Chile understands as being the point of the treaty; Chile does not want to get involved in any wars outside of the Americas. We have not the manpower nor the finance for such an endeavour at this time.

American-Chilean Defensive Pact, 1863

ARTICLE 1

1.1. The United States will aid Chile in any war in which:
1.1.1 Chile is attacked and in which the territorial integrity of Continental Chile* is threatened.
1.1.2 Chile is attacked and in which the wargoal aims in the reduction of Chilean prestige or power.

ARTICLE 2

2.1 Chile will aid the United States in any war in in which
2.1.1 The United States is attacked and in which the territorial integrity of the Continental United States** is threatened or
2.1.2 The United States is attacked and in which the wargoal aims in the reduction of United States prestige or power.

ARTICLE 3

3.1 The present treaty is valid for one (1) game session.
3.2 If the Pact is broken, the violator shall suffer a loss equal to 10 percent (10%) of his/her total prestige points.

APPENDIX

*Continental Chile is defined as any Chilean territory located on the continent of America.

**Continental United States is defined as any United States territory located on the continent of America.

[] :BIUSA: Signed
[x] :BICHL:

(OOC: basically, Chile will not aid the United States if it builds a colonial empire outside the Americas and is attacked with, say, a Demand Concession casus belli. Similarly, the USA will not help Chile in such a situation if it develops a colonial empire.)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
[x] :BIUSA: Signed.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SchFerreira
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIITA:

The Kingdom of Italy wishes to inquiry why is it that the USA is signing a defensive pact with one of it constituent states, in this case Texas.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
SchFerreira,Nov 9 2013
09:01 AM
:BIITA:

The Kingdom of Italy wishes to inquiry why is it that the USA is signing a defensive pact with one of it constituent states, in this case Texas.

:BIUSA: :BIITA:

The U.S. is impressed Italy recognizes a Texan flag, but is unimpressed it cannot recognize a Chilean flag or English words.

edit: It appears this was fixed before I noticed :P You are Chilean after all, so you'd know best ;)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly_boy
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BICHL: :BIUSA: :BIITA:

Seems like the illustrator at the Chilean foreign office just got fired, and his mistake has been fixed. :P
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
al3xytp

House of Commons
:BIBRZ: :BIUSA:

Since that most of the major Americans powers are in good terms and is applying the Monroe Doctrine, we propose the creation of an American Alliance, to protect the Americas and to assure stability. Since you're the greater power on the continent, we're submitting the idea to you first.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Magister Equitum

Field Marshals
[align=center]Posted Image[/align]
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rorlegion
Member Avatar

House of Commons
:BIUSA: OOC: Clarification of U.S. Monroe Doctrine

Because we have new players in South America, I wish to clarify U.S. foreign policy as it relates to South America. The U.S. has currently sphered most South American AI countries, and has alliances with most of these countries.

I do not care if Peru, Chile, or Brazil annexes part or all of South America, including my spheres. If any of you three wish to attack one of my spheres, just let me know first and I will dissolve the alliance. I'm trying to avoid a situation where a European power gains territory in South America. They have enough territory to divide in Asia and Africa, and I am merely trying to preserve South America for South American expansion.

If Peru, Chile, or Brazil have any questions about this, PM me and I'll clarify.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
philly_boy
Member Avatar

House of Commons
[align=center] :BICHL: :BIUSA: [/align]

The Republic of Chile is glad to hear that the United States have agreed to the Chilean President's proposal for the resolution of the diplomatic incident that unfolded these past few days between our two foreign offices. The terms agreed to were:

1. The American-Chilean Defensive Pact, 1863 will be amended as requested by the United States as a sign of good will. The United States will not be required to go to war against Brazil should the latter declare war on Chile.
2. The United States will agree to allow Chile to be peacefully transferred from the American to the North German sphere of influence.
3. The United States will not alter its stance on Chile's expansion in Bolivia. However, the United States may opt to remove American funds for the invasion of Bolivia.


Therefore, the Republic of Chile wishes to add Article 1.1.3 to the American-Chilean Defensive Pact, 1863:

1.1.3 The United States reserves the right to stay neutral in the event of a war between Brazil and Chile.

[x] :BICHL: Signed
[ ] :BIUSA:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Age of Diplomacy (AOD.I) · Next Topic »
Add Reply