| Viewing Single Post From: Ummm....I guess it'd be called 'abortion' | |
|---|---|
| Onyxian | May 14 2009, 07:03 PM |
|
Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Don't feel dumb, just think of it as new life experiences changing your past belief. But yeah, in a nutshell, what I was saying is that Men don't have a right to judge, or the right to choose for someone else. It's not our place, it's not our right, and it's not our choice. I do agree, however, that men are allowed to voice their opinions on it; the only problem I have with that is that sometimes opinions made by men (and even women) in this case are either narrow minded, one-sided, or even built up over a lack of knowledge and understanding. That being said, we are entitled to our opinions, especially if we are the father of said child in the possible light of an abortion clinic. But still, not our choice. My personal opinion on it is that there's way too many variables in any situation of pregnancy to ban it all together, or make it completely legal. In other words, any law made on it would end up harming someone in some way later down the road. It's just one of those things that can't be made into a law. The only thing I could accept is if we created an ENTIRE article in the living constitution of the United States, which could be changed and manipulated easily enough so as to add in all of the given variables. Mind you, that amendment to the constitution would probably take up the whole constitution itself...in 9 point font. Fine print style. Then maybe we might be able to account for every variable and situation. That being said, you now know how implausible it is. |
| Well, forgive me if I never come up with something for my signature other than, "HOLY CROW! I've never given my signature THIS much thought before!" | |
![]() |
|
| Ummm....I guess it'd be called 'abortion' · World Issues, Commentary & Debates | |




![]](http://209.85.122.87/static/1/pip_r.png)


4:37 AM Nov 27
