| Welcome to Da Wrestling Board. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| OAO Summerslam Thread | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 23 2006, 11:30 PM (732 Views) | |
| SamoaRowe | Aug 10 2006, 03:43 PM Post #16 |
|
dWb Superstar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Looks like the addition of ECW means that Smackdown gets cut down to two matches at Summerslam. Chavo vs. Rey, and Booker vs Batista. That's kinda shitty, eh? |
![]() |
|
| dynamite kido | Aug 10 2006, 04:30 PM Post #17 |
![]()
Harry Reems is my hero.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, it does help them considering that SD's roster has been destroyed by the wellness program. |
| |
![]() |
|
| SamoaRowe | Aug 10 2006, 04:34 PM Post #18 |
|
dWb Superstar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah, but I'm sure they'd still be able to fill four spots on a pay-per-view card. They could always add something like Kendrick/London vs. Regal/Finlay, or Finlay vs Lashley... And nevermind, I guess Smackdown will have at least three matches on the show. I forgot about Khali/Undertaker. |
![]() |
|
| dynamite kido | Aug 10 2006, 04:42 PM Post #19 |
![]()
Harry Reems is my hero.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Khali/Taker is off of the show. Because they have FINALLY come to the conclusion that he can't wrestle on live TV. Everything they've aired with him has been apparently edited. They will have a match that will Main Event the SD before Summerslam.....because it'll be taped. |
| |
![]() |
|
| SamoaRowe | Aug 10 2006, 04:44 PM Post #20 |
|
dWb Superstar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And then please tell me that they'll fire Khali... please tell me that, even if it's a lie... |
![]() |
|
| dynamite kido | Aug 10 2006, 04:45 PM Post #21 |
![]()
Harry Reems is my hero.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would assume that will be next.....unless they think he's salvagable and they want to send him back down to the developmental areas. |
| |
![]() |
|
| SamoaRowe | Aug 10 2006, 04:57 PM Post #22 |
|
dWb Superstar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I dunno. I remember that report back before Judgment Day where it said that WWE officials were beginning to realize that Khali was a lost cause. After that report, Khali went on to squash World Champion Rey Mysterio on Smackdown and cleanly beat The Undertaker at Judgment Day. |
![]() |
|
| Colcollazo | Aug 11 2006, 06:54 PM Post #23 |
|
dWb Superstar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Taker/Khali is off the card now? They can do Finlay/Regal/Lashley now, so that's good. |
![]() |
|
| dynamite kido | Aug 11 2006, 07:45 PM Post #24 |
![]()
Harry Reems is my hero.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't think that is going to happen either... |
| |
![]() |
|
| Viceroy Virus | Aug 11 2006, 08:24 PM Post #25 |
|
The Return of Andre "The Fucking" Giant!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
According to Meltzer, Khali is so bad WWE is afraid to put him on live TV. The only thing I wonder though, so bad as in he's still not feeling healthy enough to wrestle? So bad as in he doesn't know how to work WWE style and is astrocious in a WWE ring? So bad as in he's a threat to the person is wrestling, might not protect him in the match, and might possibly hurt that wrestler? Some combination of the three? Or something else all together? |
| <a href="https://imgur.com/n82v3zw"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/n82v3zw.jpg" title="source: imgur.com" /></a> | |
![]() |
|
| dynamite kido | Aug 11 2006, 10:07 PM Post #26 |
![]()
Harry Reems is my hero.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's because they don't think he's good enough for live TV. Everything Khali's done so far (besides the PPV match that him and Taker already had) has been heavily edited on TV. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Viceroy Virus | Aug 20 2006, 06:29 PM Post #27 |
|
The Return of Andre "The Fucking" Giant!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Any idea how the show is coming along? |
| <a href="https://imgur.com/n82v3zw"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/n82v3zw.jpg" title="source: imgur.com" /></a> | |
![]() |
|
| dynamite kido | Aug 21 2006, 06:48 AM Post #28 |
![]()
Harry Reems is my hero.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Results - Credit - Da Meltz
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Colcollazo | Aug 21 2006, 11:54 AM Post #29 |
|
dWb Superstar
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Summerslam actually had potential to be good, so it was dissapointing. Rey/Chavo was good aside from Vicki. It was nice when the crowd booed all three of them. Show/Sabu was terrible. Sabu was just plain awful. Hogan/Orton was alright considering how Hogan shouldn't be wrestling. Orton is pretty much fucked now. Losing to a 53 year old man who can't do squats isn't gonna help him unless they do a rematch. I really enjoyed Flair/Foley, though it was a little short. Booker/Batista was slow and boring, it basically exposed Batista's rust. It is good that Booker retained though. DX/McMahons was the typical stuff they've been doing for the whole year, only with more drama. Also Finlay stiffing HBK before the match was fun. Cena/Edge was really good, just what they needed to keep the angle going. It turned out decent but no more than that, I'm happy I didn't pay for it. |
![]() |
|
| Viceroy Virus | Aug 21 2006, 12:04 PM Post #30 |
|
The Return of Andre "The Fucking" Giant!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Meltzer is sounding more pretentious than usual.
Um, so? Who cares? I've studied to be a dialectian and I could care less.
I would've given the match about 15:00, so around 13 minutes isn't bad - especailly if you consider it's a 55 and 40 year old man juicing from the start. No wrestler should bleed for more than a few minutes before the match ends. And as for Hogan's win, of course Hogan was going to win. Hogan has never losed at SummerSlam in his entire career. Why should Hogan put over Orton at SummerSlam when Undertaker wouldn't put over Orton at WrestleMania. Orton losed at WrestleMania to Undertaker, but won at SummerSlam; I see Orton losing at SummerSlam, but winning against Hogan at Royal Rumble or WrestleMania. If we're not going to see Hogan/Austin, they might as well book Hogan/Orton. |
| <a href="https://imgur.com/n82v3zw"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/n82v3zw.jpg" title="source: imgur.com" /></a> | |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · World Wrestling Entertainment · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





5:33 PM Jul 10