| Welcome to JTF Squaretable. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| [MBC] Tuesday Bloody Tuesday - May 20th, 2009 | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: May 27 2009, 04:15 PM (624 Views) | |
| KliqerT | Jun 12 2009, 12:45 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Doughy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What Kyle said. I can't believe I forgot about that one Katie, you're right. At least Donna finally won one though, back at SOTC.
|
![]() |
|
| ratrangerm | Jun 12 2009, 03:58 PM Post #17 |
|
Aging veteran
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes, it is true, Stephanie Harper used the Blind Stipulation match. Of course, if you go back through the storyline, Stephanie did so to mess with Donna's mind, given that Donna was, and still is, all about playing mind games and finding ways to circumvent whatever rules were in place. In other words, comeuppance. Nasty word there.
|
| "Just as I discovered the meaning of life, it changed." -- George Carlin | |
![]() |
|
| MBCKyle | Jun 12 2009, 04:03 PM Post #18 |
|
The Soda Dog Refreshment Squad
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
HARPER SMASH! |
|
Everything I learned about soccer, I learned from Dro. You are to refer to Katie as "The Duchess of Der Basterdmusen" as of June 2014. She'll get angry if you don't. You've been warned. | |
![]() |
|
| crimsonjoe | Jun 12 2009, 05:24 PM Post #19 |
|
The Luther Burger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The history of the "Blind Stipulation" match, as best I can recall... Simon O'Neal had just won the MBC title after spending six months as the troubleshooting referee, during which he managed to tick off half the roster (including cause one card to be over in ten minutes when he DQ'd every match when a punch was thrown, because he wanted to get to the strip clubs). His plan was to give eight title contenders a title shot, with the catch being that the shots were only good as long as Simon held the title (the plan was to get all of the contenders to fight each other and leave Simon alone). Unfortunately (for our Bastard), the first title shot was against a 300+ pound brawler named Ogre. This leads to the following thoughts: Thought #1: Gee, it's too bad this isn't a scientific rules match. Simon could just wait for Ogre to throw a punch and get an easy win. Thought #2: Hey- Ogre signed the contract. How do we know that it ISN'T a scientific rules match? Thought #3: Even better- why not say in the contracts that Simon gets to choose the match stipulations at his whim? Thought #4: And just because Simon knows the stipulations doesn't mean he has to tell his opponents... And thus the "Blind Stipulation" match was born- as a way for Simon to rig the rules so he wouldn't lose, by not telling his opponents what the rules were. It didn't always work out, though- A triple threat ladder match (Simon starting on top of the ladder, Tom Landis and Shane Matthews starting on the floor) was wrecked when Landis threw Tinkle to knock Simon off the ladder. And the match against Alex Martinez where neither man knew the rules- Simon got a pinfall (thanks to using a chair) then screwed up and didn't realize it was a Texas Death match, giving Martinez a ten count to recover. "The Last American Badass" then turned Simon into a bloody pulp. |
![]() |
|
| Flouzemaker | Jun 12 2009, 06:51 PM Post #20 |
|
The Luther Burger
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wow. Something I wrote created some kind of reaction. That's an unusual occurrence... Well, maybe I'm too heavily influenced by the booking philosophies of Lance Storm - stuff that sounds like it should work in pro wrestling, but may not apply in e-w. For instance, the philosophy that heels only exist to make faces look cooler and/or better/tougher. I hear it's the other way 'round in e-w. Blind stip history notwithstanding, it was probably the right call for the Landis/MacKenzie match. MacKenzie needed to look like a champion because she was retaining the GTC, yet some sort of reason was needed to weasel out the Lightweight Title. And I say that only because I'm currently believing this statement:
... Cuz personally, I didn't see a need to bring back that title. There are already a whole lot of various titles in the MBC, and if it were to migrate to the UWF, it would find a similar situation. Adding shine to that title seems pretty difficult to me (though not impossible) under those circumstances. Then again, I think there are too many championships everywhere... |
![]() |
|
| « Previous Topic · MBC · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



7:20 PM Jul 10