| Hi and welcome to Terrier Talk! You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Docking Working Terriers | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 13 2007, 11:35 AM (514 Views) | |
| zandd | Nov 13 2007, 11:35 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Moderator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just curious as to why most working Terriers were traditionally docked - and indeed still can be - but not the Border Terrier? I presume it's to do with the prey but can anyone explain. Please note this is NOT a debate about docking merely a query about working terriers. |
![]() |
|
| Lu20 | Nov 13 2007, 11:58 AM Post #2 |
|
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
With regard to JRT's and PRT's the tails were docked to stop them getting caught on brambles etc whilst out hunting. I never quite understood about the full Dock but like Jess 75% Dock still gives a firm hold should the need arise for retrieval from holes etc: [assuming they don't go too deep of course :mellow: ] As a child I remember going with Dad to visit Gramps on the farm he worked at. Another labourers terrier had a badly muitilated tail after getting it caught whilst out rabbiting. |
![]() |
|
| PARSNIP | Nov 13 2007, 05:29 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Chatterbox
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It really is to stop the tails getting caught or torn; and to give a firm grip hold when extracting terriers from holes etc... |
![]() |
|
| zandd | Nov 13 2007, 05:30 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Moderator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But then why not Borders as they go to ground? |
![]() |
|
| Lu20 | Nov 13 2007, 05:53 PM Post #5 |
|
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
?
:huh: |
![]() |
|
| Tafia | Nov 13 2007, 08:53 PM Post #6 |
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I had no idea that working Border's weren't exempt from the bill. Stupid, rushed through thing that it was..... old woman wanders off grumbling |
![]() |
|
| zandd | Nov 13 2007, 09:01 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Moderator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No I worded that badly :lol: meant why weren't Borders docked - they never have been but most other working Terriers are - not that they weren't exempt,doesn'at apply to them. |
![]() |
|
| Tafia | Nov 14 2007, 12:39 AM Post #8 |
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How odd. Always presumed that they'd just had the tail end taken off if I've ever thought about it at all (and not overly sure I ever have!). Border Dawn, where are you? Quick come and answer this question! |
![]() |
|
| piwoodhouse | Nov 14 2007, 01:14 AM Post #9 |
![]()
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Found this - you'll be able to say if it's nonsense or not: Some caveats. At least one breed of working terrier does not have a docked tail -- the border terrier -- and neither do working dachshunds. The tail on a border, however, is a very solid thing and is not easily damaged. If you cannot pick up a border terrier by its tail and throw it over a fence, it's not a true border terrier. A tail that is left intact on a working Jack Russell terrier, however, often ends up being very long and thin, and as a consequence it could be subject to real damage, and so it is generally docked (taken from Terrierman's Daily Dose) |
![]() |
|
| zandd | Nov 14 2007, 09:54 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Moderator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
:lol: Daisy would approve of that method when chasing cats - thanks for that Pam never seen it put like that.The Borders tail is carrot shaped - thick at the base and thinner as it goes along compared to say a JRT where the tail is the same thickness pretty much all the way. |
![]() |
|
| Lu20 | Nov 14 2007, 10:03 AM Post #11 |
|
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Interesting, learned something today :ok: |
![]() |
|
| Tafia | Nov 14 2007, 12:15 PM Post #12 |
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How interesting, thanks for looking that up Pi! Subconciously I always imagine undocked terriers becoming whippy at the end and though never really having thought about it, just presumed Borders had had the whippy part removed! |
![]() |
|
| Linda & Fred | Apr 14 2008, 04:08 PM Post #13 |
|
Chatterbox
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I know this thread is a few months old, but it might help me to work out what's in my Fred! He's definitely got JRT in him, but he has got an extremely thick tail, and it's often used as a handle (although I haven't picked him up by it yet) or as an anchor. I thought he had Lakeland in him, but his tail is definitely thicker than that. |
![]() |
|
| roo roo | Apr 14 2008, 07:08 PM Post #14 |
|
Total Gas Bag!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
im still trying to figure out why youd be throwing border terriers over fences?is it some obscure country pastime ive never heard of? :blink: :woohoo: |
![]() |
|
| RJL | Apr 17 2008, 11:46 AM Post #15 |
Chatterbox
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wow - Fred has such a lovely head and expression. He's realy workmanlike
:) I've never seen anyone throwing a border over a fence, but at a judging seminar, Ann Roslin Williams whipped a stuffed otter's head out of her bag to show what an otter head should look like! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Working dogs · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






![]](http://209.85.122.87/static/1/pip_r.png)





12:45 PM Nov 23