Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Kia Ora
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read.

We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc.

Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page.

Thank you for stopping by.

Join our community!

In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
San Francisco Wi-Fi Issue Goes to Ballot
Topic Started: Aug 10 2007, 12:44 AM (46 Views)
VickiNC
Member Avatar

San Francisco Wi-Fi Issue Goes to Ballot

By MICHAEL LIEDTKE
AP Business Writer


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- This freewheeling city can't seem to agree if free wireless access to the Internet is such a great idea.

Hoping to break a political impasse, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom has submitted a ballot measure asking voters whether they support blanketing the city with a wireless Wi-Fi system that would enable free Web surfing subsidized by ads from Google Inc.

The November ballot measure is nonbinding, so its approval wouldn't ensure a free Wi-Fi service would be built.

But a thumbs-up would turn up the heat on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to finally clear the way for free Wi-Fi - a crusade that Newsom began championing in October 2004 as a way to keep the city on the cutting edge of technology while making it more feasible for poor households to get online.

The supervisors could beat the voters to the punch. A board hearing on the Wi-Fi issue is scheduled in September, raising the possibility it could approve or reject the proposal before voters weigh in.

The project, one of hundreds of municipal Wi-Fi systems being built or proposed across the country, has bogged down amid concerns about privacy protection, surfing speeds and the terms of the proposed contract.

The agreement, which could run for as long as 16 years, currently calls for EarthLink Inc. to build the Wi-Fi system for an estimated $14 million to $17 million. EarthLink hopes to recoup its costs by charging about $20 per month for Internet access that would be three to four times faster than the free, ad-supported service.

All the political haggling in San Francisco already has given EarthLink enough time to have second thoughts. The Atlanta-based company's new chief executive, Rolla Huff, recently said he was reviewing the viability of its municipal Wi-Fi projects, including the San Francisco proposal. EarthLink's rivals and independent analysts also have begun questioning the technical and economic models behind such projects.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Delphi51
Member Avatar
Member title
Thanks for that news, Vicky. It is a complicated issue and I'm not sure which side I'm on. I'd be interested to hear arguments here.

Should internet be supplied by government like highways, be a monopoly utility like electricity, or open to free enterprise?

It is very important because a good internet system would certainly take over telephone service (free wireless would mean free cell phone service) and probably do TV as well.

There may well be insufficient room in the wireless bandwidth for multiple suppliers, ruling out the free enterprise alternative.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Trotsky
Member Avatar
Big City Boy
At first blush I must say it sound appealing.

But then I always remember the birth of nuclear power industry and their claim that very soon nuclear electricity will become "too cheap to meter."

On the other hand, look at the incredible drop in the cost of a long distance call over the last 50 years. In real dollars, the price per minute of long distance has probably fallen nearly a thousandfold.

I hope it works for San Francisco...I would certainly vote YES!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Computer Help · Next Topic »
Add Reply