Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Kia Ora
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read.

We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc.

Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page.

Thank you for stopping by.

Join our community!

In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Liberals say Harper's end-of-regime patronage binge an abuse of process
Topic Started: Dec 12 2015, 01:57 PM (299 Views)
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
Quote:
 
OTTAWA — The Liberals say the Harper government was guilty of "abuse of process" when it went on a patronage binge on the eve of the election, making or renewing appointments for federal positions that didn't need to be filled until weeks or even months after the Conservatives were defeated.

Dominic LeBlanc, the new Liberal government's House leader, has sent letters to 33 people who received plum jobs in federal agencies or Crown corporations during the dying days of Stephen Harper's Conservative regime.

He's asking them to voluntarily resign.

LeBlanc says that's not a judgment on any of the individuals who received appointments; it's a judgment on what the new government considers the illegitimate manner in which the appointments were made.

He says the process was improper because it the appointments were not made transparently and were not subject to parliamentary scrutiny.

LeBlanc is confident that most, if not all of the 33, will voluntarily step aside.


http://www.nationalobserver.com/2015/12/10/news/liberals-say-harpers-end-regime-patronage-binge-abuse-process

Mr. LeBlanc is way more confident than I am.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
campy
Member Avatar
Handyman Extraordinaire
The Liberals have a majority.

Fire them.

The appointments were made even before the election was called so where is the abuse of process?

The opposition didn't say a word when the appointments were made?




Edited by campy, Dec 12 2015, 02:23 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FuzzyO
Member Avatar

Buying them out will cost a pretty penny.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
campy
Member Avatar
Handyman Extraordinaire
FuzzyO
Dec 12 2015, 02:25 PM
Buying them out will cost a pretty penny.
They don't have to buy them out.

They can just terminate them. That's what the Conservative interim leader said.

You see, I don't get this that the Conservatives who made the appointments well before the election are seen as some kind of monsters.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bitsy
Member Avatar
Veteran Member
campy
Dec 12 2015, 02:30 PM
They don't have to buy them out.

They can just terminate them. That's what the Conservative interim leader said.


Got a link for that?
Quote:
 
You see, I don't get this that the Conservatives who made the appointments well before the election are seen as some kind of monsters.

They weren't made well before the election; they weren't announced before the election; they were made before the terms were finished and they stretched years into the future.

Quote:
 
Former Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s cabinet quietly stacked government agencies and Crown corporations with dozens of “future appointments,” and early appointment renewals in the dying days of its regime, many of which were only scheduled to go into effect long after the Conservatives were defeated, iPolitics has learned.

While some had been due to come up for renewal in November and December, others were renewed up to a year in advance of when they had been scheduled to expire and made effective the date the appointees’ current term was due to end.

For example, Mark O’Neill’s term as director of the Canadian Museum of History wasn’t scheduled to expire until June 2016.

Last June, Harper’s cabinet renewed his $212,700 to $250,200 a year job for five years, effective June 2016.
John Badowski’s appointment as chairman of the Transportation Appeal Tribunal was renewed July 28. The renewal takes effect Jan. 1, 2019, and runs until July 29, 2020. The position currently pays between $174,700 and $205,500.

A review by iPolitics of order in council appointments by the Harper government found 49 appointments were made in recent months but scheduled to only take effect after the Oct. 19 election. Of the 49 appointments, 15 went into effect between election day and November 22. Six take effect today.

Another 28 are slated to go into effect between November 26 and January 2019.


http://ipolitics.ca/2015/11/23/doomed-harper-government-made-49-future-patronage-appointments/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
campy
Member Avatar
Handyman Extraordinaire
The link you asked for is in the opening post.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Bitsy
Member Avatar
Veteran Member
campy
Dec 12 2015, 02:20 PM
The Liberals have a majority.

Fire them.








I don't think it is quite the easy.
Quote:
 
The appointments were made even before the election was called so where is the abuse of process?

The current terms were not completed; they extended the terms way into the future.
Quote:
 
The opposition didn't say a word when the appointments were made?

They didn't know it.

Quote:
 
Trudeau’s office was caught by surprise Monday when iPolitics published a story noting the Conservatives made 49 appointments and reappointments last spring that would come into effect only after the federal election had passed, apparently an attempt by the Conservatives to bind the hands of a new government. Most appointments — in several cases for terms that had not yet expired — were dated for November and December, although some do not come into effect until January, February and March, and, in one case, 2019.

Liberal Sen. Percy Downe, who served as director of appointments for former prime minister Jean Chrétien between 1998 and 2001, called the future appointment practice “unheard of” — noting in particular the reappointment for John Badowski at the Transportation Appeal Tribunal slated for Jan. 1, 2019.

Downe expressed surprise that the Privy Council Office had not briefed the incoming government during the transition process.


http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/11/23/liberals-tory-appointments_n_8634270.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FuzzyO
Member Avatar

Quote:
 
The Prime Minister's Office is particularly incensed over the unusual, and extraordinarily high, $1-million-plus severance packages that some appointees negotiated with the Conservative government. In total, taxpayers could be on the hook for $18.5 million to break the contracts.


http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/12/07/liberals-harper-political-appointees-dominic-leblanc_n_8744792.html
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
campy
Member Avatar
Handyman Extraordinaire
So what.? Let them keep their jobs then.

These guys are qualified. Does everyone working for the government haveto be a Liberal now?

Are they just pissed off now that they have to wait to put their own guys in?

Edited by campy, Dec 12 2015, 05:35 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Rants, Bouquets, Consumer Issues · Next Topic »
Add Reply