Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Kia Ora
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read.

We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc.

Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page.

Thank you for stopping by.

Join our community!

In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Supreme Court grants land title to B.C. First Nation in landmark case
Topic Started: Jan 7 2016, 06:37 AM (89 Views)
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
Quote:
 


OTTAWA— Native groups across Canada hailed as a “game-changer” the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision to grant aboriginal title to a B.C. native group over a large tract of land — the first award of its kind.

B.C. aboriginal leaders and others immediately predicted a major impact on the Northern Gateway pipeline project and other resource developments on contested lands, with some calling it a “veto” while other legal analysts said the ruling simply reinforces existing legal duties on governments to consult with affected aboriginal groups.

Enbridge and other major industrial players were silent Thursday when the ruling was released. The B.C. and federal government, which is still negotiating some 100 land claims across the country, said little other than they were reviewing it.

“Today is a new day,” said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip of the B.C. Union of Chiefs, speaking in Vancouver. “We are in an entirely different ballgame.


http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2014/06/26/supreme_court_grants_land_title_to_bc_first_nation_in_landmark_case.html

Actions do have consequences, what we did in the past is coming home to roost. Now we will have to consider the owners of the land and negotiate, negotiate, negotiate instead of ignoring.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Trotsky
Member Avatar
Big City Boy
When you are granted "title" to land, you get more than the right to be "consulted."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
Yes you do. I suspect Daddy Corporations will do their best to erode the rights of ownership.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Delphi51
Member Avatar
Member title
I thought there were lots of "large tracts of land" under native title in BC. I visited the Nisgaa Nation where Canada's lava bed lies, and it was in the news a few months ago that the First Nation west of Williams Lake got title to a large tract of land including a town - I wonder if any residents of other races were allowed to stay in their homes?

How is "having title" different from being a first nation on a reservation? I suppose it means the right for individuals to sell or mortgage land. The land is communally owned on reservations - no other races allowed to buy land. This was done to make sure the land remained under aboriginal ownership forever.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
friendshipgal
Member Avatar
Guess everyone wants their own Trudashians
Delphi51
Jan 7 2016, 02:15 PM
I thought there were lots of "large tracts of land" under native title in BC. I visited the Nisgaa Nation where Canada's lava bed lies, and it was in the news a few months ago that the First Nation west of Williams Lake got title to a large tract of land including a town - I wonder if any residents of other races were allowed to stay in their homes?

How is "having title" different from being a first nation on a reservation? I suppose it means the right for individuals to sell or mortgage land. The land is communally owned on reservations - no other races allowed to buy land. This was done to make sure the land remained under aboriginal ownership forever.
Not only no other races but not even the Natives can own land individually.

I wonder how this compares to the huge land area ceded to the Algonquins in Ontario (not yet finalized).
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Rants, Bouquets, Consumer Issues · Next Topic »
Add Reply