Tories In A Solid Position to Win Again Thanks to Harper

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read.

We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc.

Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page.

Thank you for stopping by.

Join our community!

In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Pages:
1
2
3
4

Tories In A Solid Position to Win Again Thanks to Harper
Topic Started: Jan 24 2016, 05:05 AM (505 Views)
friendshipgal	Jan 24 2016, 05:05 AM Post #1
Guess everyone wants their own Trudashians Posts: 12,815 Group: Member Member #241 Joined: February 12, 2006	Another opinion for your reading pleasure. http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/boessenkool-speer-conservatives-are-in-a-solid-position-to-win-again-thanks-to-the-stephen-harper-decade Quote: Canadian conservatives were pleased to see 2015 come to an end. The year was marked by a disappointing election result and closed with the fawning reception of our new, young prime minister. But time and distance brings fresh perspective, especially today, on the 10-year anniversary of the modern Conservative Party of Canada’s‎ first electoral win. Canadian conservatives have a solid foundation from which to build for the future. And for this we are indebted to the intellectual and political legacy of Stephen Harper. His first electoral victory 10 years ago was far from a foregone conclusion. It required a positive vision and plan of action and Mr. Harper offered both. In so doing, he became the most important conservative in modern Canadian political history. His is not only a legacy that all conservatives can be proud of, but also a strong basis from which to continue the march . cont. Edited by friendshipgal, Jan 24 2016, 05:05 AM.

Replies:
Bitsy	Jan 24 2016, 07:18 AM Post #31
Veteran Member Posts: 31,383 Group: Member Member #267 Joined: March 11, 2006	campy Jan 24 2016, 07:15 AM Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:14 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deep The only links you post are favourable to your political bent. I'm sure you can understand that can't you? OMG, is that not the case of everyone on this forum? Geez.



Bitsy	Jan 24 2016, 07:25 AM Post #32
Veteran Member Posts: 31,383 Group: Member Member #267 Joined: March 11, 2006	campy Jan 24 2016, 07:18 AM Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:17 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. I was embarrassed to be a Canadian on WWS. Maybe it was a little unfair - a man would probably have been banned. Since the post has been deleted. It's water under the bridge. it is not under the bridge as along as you keep trying to equate it to Tony the Weasel.



campy	Jan 24 2016, 07:45 AM Post #33
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:25 AM campy Jan 24 2016, 07:18 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. it is not under the bridge as along as you keep trying to equate it to Tony the Weasel. I'm not equating anything. You live by the call, you die by the call. Unless Tony the Weasel is a cartoon character?



campy	Jan 24 2016, 07:46 AM Post #34
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:18 AM campy Jan 24 2016, 07:15 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deep OMG, is that not the case of everyone on this forum? Geez. Yes it is. But it looks like it only took ten years to catch on? Why do you knock the sources then if everyone does it? I would expect a comment on what is said instead of just knocking the source and leaving it at that. Edited by campy, Jan 24 2016, 07:47 AM.



Darcie	Jan 24 2016, 07:47 AM Post #35
Skeptic Posts: 31,154 Group: Member Member #714 Joined: March 30, 2010	campy Jan 24 2016, 07:45 AM Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:25 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. I'm not equating anything. You live by the call, you die by the call. Unless Tony the Weasel is a cartoon character? Many people call 'Tony' the Weasel. It was started by the media and has stuck like crazy glue. Can't blame a person, when there is smoke there usually is fire.



campy	Jan 24 2016, 07:48 AM Post #36
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	Darcie Jan 24 2016, 07:47 AM campy Jan 24 2016, 07:45 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. Many people call 'Tony' the Weasel. It was started by the media and has stuck like crazy glue. Can't blame a person, when there is smoke there usually is fire. I love Tony the Weasel. He is just so huggable.



Bitsy	Jan 24 2016, 07:50 AM Post #37
Veteran Member Posts: 31,383 Group: Member Member #267 Joined: March 11, 2006	campy Jan 24 2016, 07:45 AM Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:25 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. I'm not equating anything. You live by the call, you die by the call. Unless Tony the Weasel is a cartoon character? It is not the same thing as Delphi explained very clearly to you. But keep it alive, Campy, it is a good reminder .



campy	Jan 24 2016, 10:15 AM Post #38
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:50 AM campy Jan 24 2016, 07:45 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. It is not the same thing as Delphi explained very clearly to you. But keep it alive, Campy, it is a good reminder . It's exactly the same thing Bitsy. Unladylike behaviour? Trust me Bitsy. I have seen plenty of unladylike behaviour here. So tell me. I can't make any reference to the Rolling Stones incidents? Edited by campy, Jan 24 2016, 10:16 AM.



Bitsy	Jan 24 2016, 10:51 AM Post #39
Veteran Member Posts: 31,383 Group: Member Member #267 Joined: March 11, 2006	campy Jan 24 2016, 10:15 AM Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 07:50 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. It's exactly the same thing Bitsy. Unladylike behaviour? Trust me Bitsy. I have seen plenty of unladylike behaviour here. So tell me. I can't make any reference to the Rolling Stones incidents? Campy, as far as I am concerned you can make reference to anything that pleases you. Further, you don't have to convince me that it is the same thing as these words are not mine but those of WWS administration, so take it up with them. That's beneath even you, FSG. We have removed the offending post. You clearly have no intention of apologising which is disappointing. Campy, it was not political name calling, nor commenting on the singing - you missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. I was embarrassed to be a Canadian on WWS. Maybe it was a little unfair - a man would probably have been banned. Politicians are one thing, family members are another. Edited by Bitsy, Jan 25 2016, 01:44 AM.



campy	Jan 25 2016, 08:11 AM Post #40
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	Bitsy Jan 24 2016, 10:51 AM campy Jan 24 2016, 10:15 AM Quoting limited to 2 levels deepyou missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. Campy, as far as I am concerned you can make reference to anything that pleases you. Further, you don't have to convince me that it is the same thing as these words are not mine but those of WWS administration, so take it up with them. That's beneath even you, FSG. We have removed the offending post. You clearly have no intention of apologising which is disappointing. Campy, it was not political name calling, nor commenting on the singing - you missed some unladylike behaviour, politically motivated hitting back at the innocent. I was embarrassed to be a Canadian on WWS. Maybe it was a little unfair - a man would probably have been banned. Politicians are one thing, family members are another. Quote: Quote: Campy, as far as I am concerned you can make reference to anything that pleases you. Further, you don't have to convince me that it is the same thing as these words are not mine but those of WWS administration, so take it up with them. You are the only one arguing about it. When I said the post is deleted and no one can see it so it's water under the bridge. But could you accept that. Nope. You had to have a comeback. When are you going to stop trying to "put me in my place" so to speak. Edited by campy, Jan 25 2016, 08:13 AM.



Bitsy	Jan 25 2016, 09:11 AM Post #41
Veteran Member Posts: 31,383 Group: Member Member #267 Joined: March 11, 2006	I am not trying to put you in your place, just pointing out that you are trying to defend the indefensible, as was point out to you by WWS administration.



campy	Jan 25 2016, 09:35 AM Post #42
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	Bitsy Jan 25 2016, 09:11 AM I am not trying to put you in your place, just pointing out that you are trying to defend the indefensible, as was point out to you by WWS administration. And I am telling you that I dropped it and you wanted to keep it going.



heatseeker	Jan 25 2016, 09:46 AM Post #43
Veteran Member Posts: 10,320 Group: Member Member #713 Joined: March 30, 2010	Since the post has been deleted. It's water under the bridge. Good place for it. That's where trolls live.



campy	Jan 25 2016, 10:01 AM Post #44
Handyman Extraordinaire Posts: 28,720 Group: no politics Member #204 Joined: February 2, 2006	heatseeker Jan 25 2016, 09:46 AM Since the post has been deleted. It's water under the bridge. Good place for it. That's where trolls live. Personal experience?



Bitsy	Jan 25 2016, 11:00 AM Post #45
Veteran Member Posts: 31,383 Group: Member Member #267 Joined: March 11, 2006	campy Jan 25 2016, 09:35 AM Bitsy Jan 25 2016, 09:11 AM I am not trying to put you in your place, just pointing out that you are trying to defend the indefensible, as was point out to you by WWS administration. And I am telling you that I dropped it and you wanted to keep it going. Then stop the mention of Tony the Weasel and it will stop.



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Rants, Bouquets, Consumer Issues · Next Topic »

Pages:
1
2
3
4