| You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read. We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc. Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page. Thank you for stopping by. Join our community! In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| I'm so happy. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jan 28 2016, 08:15 AM (545 Views) | |
| Darcie | Jan 28 2016, 08:15 AM Post #1 |
|
Skeptic
|
I got an education today, the federal government's system of calculating how much low income seniors need to cope with the increased prices of food is sure different than mine. I am so impressed at the benevolence of the Feds, they have given me a whole $1.29 cents per month for the next three months. And there are some that tell me this is an accurate method of calculating what fixed/low income seniors need to eat right. With this system, the older you get the more you are missing to eat right. Good way to get rid of us all. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Darcie | Jan 29 2016, 06:33 AM Post #16 |
|
Skeptic
|
I have no idea what my QPP increase for the year will be. I understand it is a percentage of what you get. Not entirely fair in my way of looking at it. We who are on QPP only get our cheque on the last business day of the month. Why = because the people who were on a lower CPP/QPP get less, it is self perpetuation of a bad calculation method for the poor. The poor just get poorer. What was you raise for OAS, I got $1.29 per month for the next three months laugh123 |
![]() |
|
| Trotsky | Jan 29 2016, 06:37 AM Post #17 |
|
Big City Boy
|
In the States seniors got the princely increase of $0.00 for 2016. That is Obama's THIRD $0.00 increase and to my way of thinking represents cutting Social Security benefits clandestinely. (Like the Chinese "death by a thousand cuts.") Edited by Trotsky, Jan 29 2016, 06:48 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| heatseeker | Jan 29 2016, 06:42 AM Post #18 |
Veteran Member
|
This is where my native cynicism came in handy. Very early, after leaving school with a Grade 9 education and going to work, I came to believe that it was dangerous to rely on government, corporations or any other entity for financial support. So I didn't. My Canada Pension goes to defray the cost of my grand daughter's autism therapy. But if I didn't get it, we would still be ok. If things got really bad I'd get off my ass and earn some money. Edited by heatseeker, Jan 29 2016, 06:43 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Trotsky | Jan 29 2016, 06:52 AM Post #19 |
|
Big City Boy
|
So, what was your last job, heatseeker? |
![]() |
|
| heatseeker | Jan 29 2016, 06:53 AM Post #20 |
Veteran Member
|
The last thing I made money at was renovating houses. |
![]() |
|
| haili | Jan 29 2016, 12:57 PM Post #21 |
|
Gold Star Member
|
I think most of us here worked hard for a living and paid plenty of taxes all our lives but I doubt there are many jobs out there for people past retirement age. Young people have a hard time finding decent jobs these days. |
![]() |
|
| swing | Jan 29 2016, 12:57 PM Post #22 |
swing
|
Obviously a SMART business man Heat! |
![]() |
|
| heatseeker | Jan 29 2016, 01:26 PM Post #23 |
Veteran Member
|
Skipping all of those years of school was an enormous advantage. laugh123 |
![]() |
|
| Shorty | Jan 29 2016, 06:02 PM Post #24 |
Red Star Member
|
Smart, talented and hard working. Good for you. |
![]() |
|
| Bitsy | Jan 30 2016, 01:38 AM Post #25 |
|
Veteran Member
|
Don't forget witty and wise!!! |
![]() |
|
| Darcie | Jan 30 2016, 02:14 AM Post #26 |
|
Skeptic
|
You obviously also had good luck for yourself, not getting a chronic illness or having a debilitating accident. Wish I had been so lucky, because the work I did. Edited by Darcie, Jan 30 2016, 02:14 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Trotsky | Jan 30 2016, 02:21 AM Post #27 |
|
Big City Boy
|
Sounds like something you might be able to return to without too much dependence on corporate or governmental involvement. Of course, not if those who own the houses in need of renovation have been screwed over by corporation's and government's reneging on their promises. So you would, more or less, retain secondary dependence on these promises. Edited by Trotsky, Jan 30 2016, 02:43 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| FuzzyO | Jan 30 2016, 02:25 AM Post #28 |
|
I think he bought the house, renovated and sold. A flipper! |
![]() |
|
| Bitsy | Jan 30 2016, 02:36 AM Post #29 |
|
Veteran Member
|
I always thought I would like to be flapper. laugh123 |
![]() |
|
| heatseeker | Jan 30 2016, 02:45 AM Post #30 |
Veteran Member
|
You obviously also had good luck for yourself, not getting a chronic illness or having a debilitating accident. Wish I had been so lucky, because the work I did. Yes indeed. Additionally, I was born at the right time, in the right place, was the right gender and race at the time, and possessed some skills and talents that were in high demand. And my luck has held. I have all the friends I want, my two kids are interesting, entertaining and ethical and this happens to be one of the great times in history to be alive. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Rants, Bouquets, Consumer Issues · Next Topic » |






5:48 AM Jul 14