Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Kia Ora
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read.

We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc.

Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page.

Thank you for stopping by.

Join our community!

In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
New Taxes
Topic Started: Mar 6 2016, 12:56 AM (343 Views)
haili
Member Avatar
Gold Star Member
It seems that I'm not alone complaining about Kathleen Wynn's new taxes on home heating, hydro, gas, drugs, etc. The Toronto Star letter page is full of complaints by seniors wondering how to make ends meet with all these extra costs and only a less than $6. raise in the old age pension. How this will help global warming is beyond me since we all still have to heat and light our homes and many like me have to drive to get to appointments, shopping etc. The companies that can afford it will continue to pollute and can buy carbon credits, so where is the benefit? It all seems like a tax grab that does nothing for the environment IMO.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Trotsky
Member Avatar
Big City Boy
Quote:
 
It seems that I'm not alone complaining about Kathleen Wynn's new taxes on home heating, hydro, gas, drugs, etc. The Toronto Star letter page is full of complaints by seniors wondering how to make ends meet with all these extra costs and only a less than $6.


That sounds like the machinations of a very right wing conservative government who believes the country should be carried on the backs of the poor with regressive taxes (raise taxes on the poor so they can be cut for the rich.) I thought you guys voted for a different type of government than that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
FuzzyO
Member Avatar

Yup, we gave the provincial Liberal governement a resounding mandate in spite of many things.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
FuzzyO
Mar 6 2016, 01:37 AM
Yup, we gave the provincial Liberal governement a resounding mandate in spite of many things.
Remember Huduck? If we picked the NDP the taxes would be higher I think.

No one likes taxes, but what they buy is just assumed to be our right for free. laugh123
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
friendshipgal
Member Avatar
Guess everyone wants their own Trudashians
there are more carbon taxes on the way from the Feds.

No one expects anything for free, except maybe socialist or NDPers. However, the additional taxes are regressive and causing lot of pain for lower and middle income people. They are using their new 'revenue tools' to help balance the books on the backs of students, seniors and families. If carbon taxes are intended to lower demand for heat, fuel and hydro I doubt that most of us could cut back much more unless we go back to living in a cave.

ETA: Premier Wynne tells Justin Trudeau that his greenhouse gas targets are unmeetable -- you know they're unmeetable

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-government-climate-targets-1.3477171
Edited by friendshipgal, Mar 6 2016, 04:24 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
wildie
Member Avatar
Veteran Member
Trotsky
Mar 6 2016, 01:22 AM
Quote:
 
It seems that I'm not alone complaining about Kathleen Wynn's new taxes on home heating, hydro, gas, drugs, etc. The Toronto Star letter page is full of complaints by seniors wondering how to make ends meet with all these extra costs and only a less than $6.


That sounds like the machinations of a very right wing conservative government who believes the country should be carried on the backs of the poor with regressive taxes (raise taxes on the poor so they can be cut for the rich.) I thought you guys voted for a different type of government than that.
This government has profoundly demonstrated that we have an electorate with a questionable intellect!

Rumour has it that Trump has been reading Kathleen Wynne's play book!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
heatseeker
No Avatar
Veteran Member
It isn't just the provincial government.

The city of Toronto keeps bumping up fees for everything, most notably water sewage and garbage collection.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
We could always get a hunk of land in the boondocks, cut the trees down, build a cabin, dig a pit and and outhouse, then dig a well for water, put in a septic tank and somehow provide our own heat and power (get a solar system going). The possibilities are endless. We would have to buy a snowmobile for transportation, no roads, and a horse for the summer. We could also put in a garden and raise chickens eh! I'm exhausted already.
Edited by Darcie, Mar 6 2016, 05:23 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
haili
Member Avatar
Gold Star Member
But snowmobiles use gas! Digging wells takes energy and lots of money and rural property isn't cheap. We already pay some of the highest energy prices in Canada and now it's even higher. My hydro bill went up about $30 though I try to do washing etc. during lower peak times.

I don't see much difference between Liberals and Conservatives and at least the NDP wouldn't tax the lowest income people. We already have sales taxes that affect even the lowest income people. Remember when Cretien promised to "axe the tax?" That didn't happen.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
swing
No Avatar
swing
Our utility bill which came online yesterday, electricity used amounted to 42.00, total after charges 97.00. Gas used was 33.00, total after charges 135.00, adding garbage pick up and water, bill totals 358.00. Imagine what it is in -30!
Edited by swing, Mar 6 2016, 06:21 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Delphi51
Member Avatar
Member title
All taxes end up being paid by the people. Companies just pass them on to us.

I think the same applies to government spending. We have to pay for it in taxes, or at least the interest on it until a future government feels it can be paid off without upsetting voters too much. A billion here and a billion there adds up to a lot of interest over a few years. I think Ontario has to pay $30 billion in interest per year now ($2000 per person). Alberta is catching up quickly. And what happens if interest doubles to 2%?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
Delphi51
Mar 6 2016, 07:26 AM
All taxes end up being paid by the people. Companies just pass them on to us.

I think the same applies to government spending. We have to pay for it in taxes, or at least the interest on it until a future government feels it can be paid off without upsetting voters too much. A billion here and a billion there adds up to a lot of interest over a few years. I think Ontario has to pay $30 billion in interest per year now ($2000 per person). Alberta is catching up quickly. And what happens if interest doubles to 2%?
So.... we pay all this interest to the banks eh?

Who is "the bank" who gets all this money?

It is the shareholders of the bank, mostly the rich.

The rich own the government and the taxes, and yet we go on and on supporting this system.

It is called capitalism, grin and bear it.

Boggles my mind.
Edited by Darcie, Mar 6 2016, 07:35 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Delphi51
Member Avatar
Member title
Quote:
 
The Ontario debt consists of domestic bonds, international bonds, treasury bills & U.S. commercial paper and non-public debt. As of September 30, 2013 the breakdown is as below:[7]

Domestic Bonds - $189.6B (66%)
International Bonds - $65.5B (23%)
Treasury Bills & U.S. Commercial Paper - $19.7B (7%)
Non-Public Debt - $13.3B (4%)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_government_debt
Looks like the debt is mostly held by people who bought bonds. That would include pension funds, seniors' RRSPs and the like. No doubt some wealthy people bought some of the bonds, though I expect they can afford to invest in riskier things like companies, land, new ideas.

I don't have any bonds but I do have shares of several banks that probably have some Ontario bonds.

The communist countries and some dictatorships tried taking wealth away from the rich and it didn't work out very well. They tend to move away and take their valuables with them. Much of the wealth is invested in infrastructure so taking it away for government impulse spending tends to make a country less well off.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Trotsky
Member Avatar
Big City Boy
Quote:
 
Rumour has it that Trump has been reading Kathleen Wynne's play book!


Turning the pages with his teeny-weeny little hands. laugh123 laugh123
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
Delphi51
Mar 6 2016, 09:41 AM
Quote:
 
The Ontario debt consists of domestic bonds, international bonds, treasury bills & U.S. commercial paper and non-public debt. As of September 30, 2013 the breakdown is as below:[7]

Domestic Bonds - $189.6B (66%)
International Bonds - $65.5B (23%)
Treasury Bills & U.S. Commercial Paper - $19.7B (7%)
Non-Public Debt - $13.3B (4%)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_government_debt
Looks like the debt is mostly held by people who bought bonds. That would include pension funds, seniors' RRSPs and the like. No doubt some wealthy people bought some of the bonds, though I expect they can afford to invest in riskier things like companies, land, new ideas.

I don't have any bonds but I do have shares of several banks that probably have some Ontario bonds.

The communist countries and some dictatorships tried taking wealth away from the rich and it didn't work out very well. They tend to move away and take their valuables with them. Much of the wealth is invested in infrastructure so taking it away for government impulse spending tends to make a country less well off.

Why does everyone think that communism is the only alternative to capitalism.

With all the brains around you would think that economists etc. could come up with a system that is superior to either, for a start, take the best from both and add to it.

It is doomsday thinking that there is only capitalism and communism, it is shutting of the brain.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Rants, Bouquets, Consumer Issues · Next Topic »
Add Reply