Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

Kia Ora
You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and that there are some features you can't use or read.

We are an active community of worldwide senior members participating in chat, politics, travel, health, blogging, graphics, computer issues & help, book club, literature & poetry, finance discussions, recipe exchange and much more. Also, as a member you will be able to access member only sections, many features, send personal messages, make new friends, etc.

Registration is simple, fast and completely free. Why not register today and become a part of the group. Registration button at the very top left of the page.

Thank you for stopping by.

Join our community!

In case of difficulty, email worldwideseniors.org@gmail.com.
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Update on GMO foods
Topic Started: Mar 16 2016, 05:38 PM (133 Views)
Delphi51
Member Avatar
Member title
Quote:
 
There is now a long list of national bodies that suggest approved GMOs are no riskier to eat than conventionally produced food. In addition to regulators, they include: the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, the Royal Society of Medicine, the World Health Organization and the European Commission (even though more than a dozen European countries want to ban GM crops). Moreover, a 2015 Pew Research Center survey of scientists who belong to the American Association for the Advancement of Science found that 88 per cent believe it is safe to eat GM foods, compared to just 37 per cent of the public at large. That’s slightly higher (one percentage point) than the number of scientists who believed climate change was “mostly due to human activity.”
http://www.macleans.ca/society/science/in-praise-of-genetically-modified-foods/
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Olive Oil
No Avatar
Gold Star Member
My biggest concern is that they don't require labelling . We deserve to know what we are eating.
I also wonder about allergies.
They are probably the key to preventing starvation.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Trotsky
Member Avatar
Big City Boy
I just want to be told what foods are GMO. I can make my own decision about whether I want to buy them or not.

If they are Hell bent on denying me that information, I can only presume it is for a reason they want me not to know.

I am a big boy, chemically savvy, and I have no vested monetary interest, only my own health.
Edited by Trotsky, Mar 17 2016, 03:59 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
heatseeker
No Avatar
Veteran Member
Blame Monsanto and its stupid greedy intro of GMO seeds, which practically guaranteed widespread opposition. They could have rolled out seeds that yielded drought resistant or more nutritious crops but chose instead to introduce stuff that is resistant to poisons.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Darcie
Member Avatar
Skeptic
Trotsky
Mar 17 2016, 03:58 AM
I just want to be told what foods are GMO. I can make my own decision about whether I want to buy them or not.

If they are Hell bent on denying me that information, I can only presume it is for a reason they want me not to know.

I am a big boy, chemically savvy, and I have no vested monetary interest, only my own health.
023

I'm with you all the way. Furthermore, why am I denied choice? Choice is suppose to be the foundation of democracy and those corporate rich guys are doing everything they can to not only not allow me the information I need to choose, but to also take me by the you know what and tell me what is good for me to put in my body.

Being female they also want to tell me what I can produce.

I am tired of living in a society where less and less information is provided to limit my choices.

It isn't about a single issue like GMO but it is about the system of secrecy that is involved to control us.

This single issue stuff has us debating the wrong issue, think about it and you will realize it does matter and will matter increasingly in the future.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
margrace
No Avatar
Gold Star Member
Right Darcie what are they covering up.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dana
Member Avatar
WWS Hummingbird Guru & Wildlife photographer extrordinaire
By a thin margin there may soon be labels in the USA . Looks like most people want this.

http://www.alternet.org/food/remarkable-triumph-democracy-over-corporate-power-gmo-labeling-has-finally-arrived-us#.Vve6s5SuMBY.twitter

Quote:
 
For that last 15 years, numerous organizations and legislators have been battling to require the labeling of genetically engineered foods. During that time 64 other countries have mandated this labeling, but not the U.S. Many of us in the food movement have said that it was not a matter of if we would join with these countries and have GE labeling, but when. Well, it looks like when may have finally arrived.

Over the course of just a few days, several major companies have announced they will label GE products, including Kellogg’s, ConAgra, Mars and General Mills. Earlier this year, Campbell’s announced it would label. What caused this wave of GE labeling? It certainly hasn’t been a sudden realization that more than 90 percent of Americans want labeling, which polls have shown for many years. And these companies have never been pro-labeling. Just the opposite. Each has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund massive PR campaigns opposing various state GE labeling initiatives.

This sudden turnaround was actually triggered by a remarkable triumph of democracy over corporate power that took place last week in the U.S. Senate. That vote involved an attempt to pass what many call The Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act. This bill introduced by Senator Pat Roberts (R-KS) was specifically designed to rescind all state laws requiring labeling of GE foods. Of special concern was Vermont’s labeling law, which is scheduled to go into effect July 1, 2016.

Edited by Dana, Mar 28 2016, 12:08 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Trotsky
Member Avatar
Big City Boy
Pretty good news, Dana.

But it would have been better for Congress to DEMAND labeling instead of merely allowing states to do it on a piecemeal basis.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Dana
Member Avatar
WWS Hummingbird Guru & Wildlife photographer extrordinaire
Perhaps they are all scared of losing campaign donations.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Rants, Bouquets, Consumer Issues · Next Topic »
Add Reply