| Welcome to Yu-Gi-Oh! Central. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Sidedeck: A Game Within a Game; Learn how to Build a Side Deck | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 16 2005, 11:30 PM (266 Views) | |
| Kyp Durron | Jul 16 2005, 11:30 PM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
Why use a side deck? To counter the metagame (what your oppoent(s) play). What sould be in a side deck? Cards that are effective against the metagame For example, the commom meta is laced with chaos, warriors, zombies and gravekeepers. Total (15) Monsters () Kycoo x2 * effect stops chaos from removing monsters * Kinetic Soldier x3 * gains 2000 attack against warriors * Spells () Soul Release x3 * remove monsters before chaos can * Chain Energy x3 * charge gravekeepers and warriors for swarming * Necrovalley x2 * stop zombies from regenerating * Traps () Gravity Bind x2 * hold back warriors attacks * |
|
|
| Vampire Lord | Jul 16 2005, 11:47 PM Post #2 |
|
Green Flame
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I might run LLAB over G. Bind, just cuz there's less spell negation out there and switching them to defense is even better than plain old attack blocking. |
| --Vampire Lord | |
![]() |
|
| Apocolypse | Jul 17 2005, 12:38 PM Post #3 |
![]()
Champion
|
yah, same here, LLAB is far better then G-Bind in most aspects. Maybe you could side deck Toll too, coist them for trying to attack. |
| I will kill anyone who dares stand in my way of world conquest! *ehem* I mean, if I am opposed you shall indeed regret it! | |
![]() |
|
| Raging Flame Sprite | Jul 17 2005, 10:39 PM Post #4 |
|
Unregistered
|
i do agree that LLAB might be better, b/c its not Jinzo-negated, but that can hurt ur deck too. and when side-decking, u have to be careful to not cripple ur deck... |
|
|
| tea'sfavoriteharumboy | Jul 20 2005, 03:05 AM Post #5 |
|
KINGY EDITED YOUR TITLE
|
yeah, you need to add a supproter card of your own, too.... at least one.... i got myself winged minion, apart from that, i got this: 1 des koala 1 the elephant statue of (uh, i forget.. the one that gets me points...) 1 winged minion uuuhh.... i can't remeber the rest right now, and am currently to tired to get it.... lol, it's like, 4:04 in the mornming here... not a wink of sleep.... |
|
....that was a joke up above .....ok no it wasn't. .....Got you again. ......or did I | |
![]() |
|
| Kyp Durron | Jul 21 2005, 12:27 AM Post #6 |
|
Unregistered
|
the advantage that G-Bind has over LLAB is that it can be sprung for a suprise, which is one of the advantages of the side deck. |
|
|
| Vampire Lord | Jul 21 2005, 01:14 AM Post #7 |
|
Green Flame
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's true. However, MST will kill Gravity Bind just as well if it's sprung by surprise as it would kill a Level Limit. |
| --Vampire Lord | |
![]() |
|
| Kyp Durron | Jul 21 2005, 01:21 AM Post #8 |
|
Unregistered
|
so what was ur point there then? |
|
|
| Vampire Lord | Jul 21 2005, 01:26 AM Post #9 |
|
Green Flame
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
When I say that LLAB is better than G. Bind? Simple: *Monsters go to def position, which could buy you an extra turn at times (aka, your opponent summons Mobius) *Can't be negated by Jinzo |
| --Vampire Lord | |
![]() |
|
| Kyp Durron | Jul 21 2005, 01:30 AM Post #10 |
|
Unregistered
|
i believe u meant ie, not aka, and Force is under the same restricions, so is LLAB better than Force?? |
|
|
| Vampire Lord | Jul 21 2005, 01:34 AM Post #11 |
|
Green Flame
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We both know the answer to that question is no, and the fact that both can be MSTed just as effectively isn't my main argument -- it's just the reason why your point about the surprise factor isn't terribly valid. Mirror Force is better than LLAB because it destroys, not just stalls. |
| --Vampire Lord | |
![]() |
|
| Kyp Durron | Jul 21 2005, 01:37 AM Post #12 |
|
Unregistered
|
but on the contrary, is MF always better than LLAB?? no. LLAB is more effective in a burn deck, or to counter a warrior deck, than MF is b/c it can protect u for multiple turns, where as MF can protect u for 1. but to get back to the main arguement, both LLAB and GB are good cards, and should see about the same amount of play. |
|
|
| Vampire Lord | Jul 21 2005, 01:43 AM Post #13 |
|
Green Flame
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mirror Force, just saving you for one turn? To the contrary -- Mirror Force can completely turn the duel around. It will typically destroy 2-3 monsters, which most likely took your opponent 2-3 turns to build up. |
| --Vampire Lord | |
![]() |
|
| Kyp Durron | Jul 21 2005, 01:45 AM Post #14 |
|
Unregistered
|
2 to 3 monsters?? if ur lucky. MF usually kills 1 or 2. monsters don't stay on the feild long enough for MF to be considered that godly |
|
|
| Apocolypse | Jul 22 2005, 08:39 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Champion
|
Ok, back on topic here. Both LLAB and G-Bind serve there purpose. They are both really good. Just have them both out at the same time and you should be fine for a while. |
| I will kill anyone who dares stand in my way of world conquest! *ehem* I mean, if I am opposed you shall indeed regret it! | |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Articles · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2







![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)


9:18 AM Jul 11